![]() Tactical battles seem a lot better in aow3 as well. The thing that sells me on aow3 over FE is the promised pbem support, though admittedly its not here yet, so I am being a bit pie in the sky here. ![]() Just get the one you like most first and wait for a nice sale on the other one and keep 'em both installed. The 2 games are different enough that I think there's nothing wrong with liking and having both. No one is the winner but fallen enchantress is such an ugly game.battles maps are drawn horribly and are boring to play thru.2d main exploring map.combat is really twitchy.animations are horrible.so who is the real winner.a game that looks 1999 dated or a game that looks like it was made recently.like they say.UGLY GOES RIGHT TO THE like this generation of games reallly. ![]() In my opinion Warlords Battlecry 3 was an awesome game ! Just my thoughts as I won't be playing this game as much. While Aow3 is a good game, Fallen is better! The only good with Aow3 is castle siege while it's nice but Fallen Enchantress just has much a much more deeper feel to it. Originally posted by ronniebranch:I'd have to say Fallen Enchantress, simply because of no cap on levels to my knowledge, interesting quests, feels like a magical world each new game.Īow3 is good for tactical combat but it gets old fast since it lacks deep hero development and seems to be missing other things, long random games get boring fast, turns take to long compared to Fallen EnchantressĪow3 uses all tier 4 units gets old quick, after playing both Fallen Enchantress offers more
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |